Loanyzer may use AI tools to support research organization, outlines, drafting assistance, editing, summarization, and quality checks across our editorial workflow. AI is used as a workflow aid, not as an independent financial expert, lender, tax advisor, attorney, or final publisher.
How AI may be used
AI tools may help us organize a topic, compare possible article structures, identify missing questions, summarize source material, draft plain-language explanations, improve readability, or check whether a page has enough internal links and disclaimers. AI can make the editorial process faster, but speed is not the goal. The goal is clearer and more useful financial education.
Human review
AI-assisted articles and updates may receive automated source and calculation checks. These checks do not establish human review. We display a human reviewer and review date only when a named person has attested a review of the exact published version. Editing the content invalidates the attestation for the previous version. An Updated date alone does not indicate human review.
What AI should not do
AI should not fabricate sources, invent lender offers, guarantee approvals, create fake rates, claim that a program is available without verification, provide personalized tax or legal advice, or publish rate-sensitive claims without a source. AI-generated wording must not hide uncertainty, exaggerate benefits, or make a financial product appear safer or cheaper than it really is.
Sources and attribution
When content relies on outside information, Loanyzer prefers to link to official or primary sources. We may also use secondary sources for context, but official guidance should control when there is a conflict. Our Methodology explains how we treat calculator assumptions, sources, and limitations.
Editorial accountability
Jaime de Souza, founder and editorial lead, is responsible for editorial standards and corrections. Article bylines identify recorded contributors or the Loanyzer editorial team. A team byline is organizational authorship, not an individual identity or a claim that the founder reviewed that version. AI assistance, automated checks, and an attested human review are distinct parts of the process. Readers can report concerns through our Corrections Policy or Contact Us page.
Why we disclose AI assistance
Google’s Search guidance says AI can be useful for research and structure, but content should be accurate, high quality, relevant, and created for people rather than search manipulation. We disclose AI assistance because readers deserve to understand how content is made, especially in financial education. See our Editorial Policy and Corrections Policy for the broader accountability process.
Related pages
For broader transparency, see About Us, our Methodology, and the Disclaimer that explains the limits of financial education content.